Russia's first stealth fighter makes maiden flight

ErikStenger

Registered User
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
5,925
Age
43
capt.f6bdf551b6e04d61a48fc988ec8da493.russia_stealth_fighter_mosb102.jpg


MOSCOW – Russia's first stealth fighter intended to match the latest U.S. design made its maiden flight Friday, boosting the country's efforts to modernize its rusting Soviet-built arsenals and retain its lucrative export market.

The Sukhoi T-50's flight comes nearly two decades after the first prototype of the U.S. F-22 Raptor took to the air, and Russian officials said it will take another five years for the new jet to enter service. Still, the flight marked a major step in Russia's efforts to burnish the faded glory of its aviation industries and strengthen a beleaguered military.

The sleek twin-engined jet closely resembling the Raptor flew for 47-minutes from an airfield at Sukhoi's production plant in the Far Eastern city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur on Friday. Development of the so-called fifth-generation fighter has been veiled in secrecy and no images of it had been released before the flight.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin hailed the flight as a "big step forward," but admitted that "a lot remains to be done in terms of engines and armament."

Craig Caffrey, an analyst for Jane's Defense Procurement-Military Aircraft, said the new fighter is "hugely important," both for modernizing the aging Russian air force fleet and retaining export markets.

"The T-50 should offer the Russian Air Force a significant boost in its capabilities and ensure that it remains one of the best equipped air forces in the world," he told The Associated Press by e-mail.

Caffrey said the new fighter will attract many foreign customers. "For those countries that don't traditionally purchase military equipment from the U.S. it will be the only fifth generation aircraft available," he said.

The NPO Saturn company said in a statement that the jet has new engines, but military analysts suggested that they were a slightly modernized version of the Soviet-era engine powering the Su-27 family of fighters.

"It's a humbug," said independent military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer. "It's just a prototype lacking new engines and a new radar. It takes new materials to build a fifth-generation fighter, and Russia lacks them."

Putin said Friday the first batch of new fighters is set to enter an Air Force evaluation unit in 2013 and serial production is set to begin in 2015.

Caffrey said the task looks "very challenging, given the amount of new technology that is being incorporated into the new aircraft."

Russian military analysts were also skeptical, pointing at a history of delays in the program and other Russian weapons projects.

"The schedule will likely be pushed back as usual," said Alexander Konovalov, the head of the Moscow-based Institute of Strategic Assessment, an independent think tank.

Russia's prospective Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile has failed in at least eight of its 12 test launches, dealing a blow to Russia's hopes of making it a cornerstone of its nuclear arsenal. Officials have blamed the failures on manufacturing flaws resulting from post-Soviet industrial degradation.

Felgenhauer and other observers said the fighter program, which depends on hundreds of subcontractors, has been dogged by similar problems.

Russian officials have said the new fighter, like the Raptor, will have supersonic cruising speed and stealth capabilities. Its pilot, Sergei Bogdan, said in televised remarks that it was easy and pleasant to fly.

While officials saw the new fighter as essential, some analysts said the country has more pressing needs.

"There is no mission and no adversary for such plane," Konovalov said, adding that the Russian military lacks a modern communications system and satellite navigation. "It would be more expedient to fit modern avionics to older generation jets."

The U.S. administration decided to quit buying the F-22 Raptor, the world's most expensive fighter jet at more than $140 million apiece, effectively capping its production at the 186 already ordered.

capt.f6bdf551b6e04d61a48fc988ec8da493.russia_stealth_fighter_mosb102.jpg


In this photo released by the Sukhoi Company Press Service and taken Thursday, Jan. 28, 2010, a Russian-made Sukhoi T-50 prototype fifth-generation fighter jet is seen at a test airfield near the Siberian city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Russia. Russia's new fifth-generation stealth fighter made a successful maiden test flight on Friday, the manufacturer said.

More photos & a video: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?149828-Sukhoi-T-50-PAK-FA
 
Interesting that the Russian Government did not comment on the article, or the fighter it self. Also note that it is just a prototype and a full scale model will most likely be 10 years away from entering a full combat role if not more.

IMO: I do understand Russia's military needs on a defense POV, but they should be more worried about their dwindling population than making a new jet that's gonna be out classed when released
 
They're designing it to deliver tactical nuclear strikes on the West.

За Родину! За Путина!
 
the outclassed part if a bit of an interesting comment, the new mig 35 (Next gen 29) has optical sensors that can detect and identify aircraft at some pretty silly ranges (silly big, but i don't remember how big) they also have 3d thrust vectoring (the nozzle can move in a circle, not up just up and down) active electronically scanning array radar has been incorporated into lots of aircraft now and not just the 22. stealth on stealth, the guy with the optical sensors will win. the f-35 btw is fail, the Australian government evaluated it and found it "doubly ineffective" they said it can not run (too slow mofo) and it can not fight (not maneuverable enough) not to mention that you can have more gen 4.5 (mig 35) for the same price as 1 f-35. should the Russians implement the technologies they have developed into their new fighter it may outclass the f-22 and it will definitely outnumber it. let us not forget that the russians have also developed "plasma shield" technology for their aircraft which greatly reduces their radar and heat signatures.(rumoured to be put in the mig 1.44/1.42 demonstrator) i know it sounds sci fi, but it is documented if you look. and for the record, a lot of aircraft look alike. Trust the russians to be creative in the building of their aircraft. I do like the VTOL abilities of the F-35B though, that is sweet
 
in 80's, Su-27 and MiG-29 already have IRST,that means optical sensors, all this "new" its just electronic updates, nothing more :( T-50 may be have good electronics and engines, but like all other stealth fighters it has bad aerodynamics. i think our russian milutary shod finish development of Su-47 Berkut, this plane has incredible flying ability and realy 5th generation aerodynamics.
 
С этим истребителем, Россия будет уничтожить Запад. Ура!

Jk :-d
 
С этим истребителем, Россия будет уничтожить Запад. Ура!

Jk :-d
за Родину, за Сталина! :) but i think that T-50 has bad close air combat ability, damn, we dont need attaсker, we need air superiority fighter!
 
the outclassed part if a bit of an interesting comment, the new mig 35 (Next gen 29) has optical sensors that can detect and identify aircraft at some pretty silly ranges (silly big, but i don't remember how big) they also have 3d thrust vectoring (the nozzle can move in a circle, not up just up and down) active electronically scanning array radar has been incorporated into lots of aircraft now and not just the 22. stealth on stealth, the guy with the optical sensors will win. the f-35 btw is fail, the Australian government evaluated it and found it "doubly ineffective" they said it can not run (too slow mofo) and it can not fight (not maneuverable enough) not to mention that you can have more gen 4.5 (mig 35) for the same price as 1 f-35. should the Russians implement the technologies they have developed into their new fighter it may outclass the f-22 and it will definitely outnumber it. let us not forget that the russians have also developed "plasma shield" technology for their aircraft which greatly reduces their radar and heat signatures.(rumoured to be put in the mig 1.44/1.42 demonstrator) i know it sounds sci fi, but it is documented if you look. and for the record, a lot of aircraft look alike. Trust the russians to be creative in the building of their aircraft. I do like the VTOL abilities of the F-35B though, that is sweet


What you say has some validity is regards to the facts about the sensor package of the T-50, however , it is a moot one. Given the state of security surrounds both programs, anyone that says one has advantages over the other has no idea what their talking about, and would be pure speculation, lest both parties have Lvl III Top Secret clearances with Lockheed Martin and what dark and frozen manufacturer makes the Russian PAK FA.


Regarding the F-35 comments, I disagree with you in every fashion. The JSF aka F-35, is a Multi-role, stand off attack fighter. It's role is not the same as the the F-22, and it fills a completely different role in military aviation that the PAK 50 and the F-22.

The PAK T-50 and F/A-22 Raptor are air superiority fighters, designed specifically for that.

However like the A-10, A-7 Intruder, F-18C, and A/V-8 Harrier the F-35A/B/C is designed to fufill the roles of all 4 of those aircraft: Multi role, Reconnaissance, stand-off attack, and close air support.

The F-35 hosts some of the best integrated optical avionics of the day, The airframe has over 100 cameras and sensors placed all over its airframe. The combat systems have also have a targeting system similar to the IHADSS system on the AH-64D. In Short, the Pilot no longer has to move the Aircraft towards its target to engage. All the pilot has to do is look at his target acquire a lock, and thats it. There is no need to reposition the whole aircraft to make a direct strike on the target via air or ground. As far as being slow and lacking functions that are not able to meet Australia's needs. lets be serious here for a minute.... Why on earth would Australia of all nations need an F-35?? they have no political enemies, they have Military Units within Iraq and Afghanistan, however in that give theatre, why do they need an air superiority tactical fighter, much lest can they even afford one with their pitiful GDP. Im sorry pilot but that is a very poor example.

Regarding the F-35's disadvantage in Air to Air engagements I would agree that it's abilities are defensive at the least, and a short range light interceptor. It's primary role like a said is air support to ground units. The F-35 has an extremely sophisticated network which it can share information from all elements of the battlefield, ground, air, naval, UAV and UCAV elements to deliver accurate fire support. The F-35 VTOL and STOL are designed to standardize the military's fighter inventory without having to train Mechanics and technicians on 8 or 9 different airframes, thus saving money.
 
Back
Top